In one of my projects I needed that all data sent to a model were converted in upper case prior they validated and then saved, once valid. I've chosen to keep them in upper case for better readability. There was no problem with converting ASCII data. Everything worked like a charm. Problem started when I tried to save data in Cyrillic. upcase! just refused to modify non-ASCII characters.
Here's how I made it to work, finally.
class Address < ActiveRecord::Base
before_validation :uppercase_data
def uppercase_data
%w{street city state country}.each do |x|
self.send("#{x}=", self.send(x).mb_chars.upcase.to_s)
end
end
end
Maybe someone will suggest a more elegant solution?
Another project went public. A e-commerce web site for Comfort Stick skin care line of products. http://comfortstick.com/


A few days ago I checked the code using the Ruby project roodi, and I received a warning saying "Don't use 'for' loops. Use Enumerable.each instead." I personally do not see any difference between these two versions of cycles, and attributed the problem of choice to issues of personal faith. I asked people in the !ruby group of identi.ca, but the answers were not convincing. Google also did not shed light on this question.
I changed the code to use Enumerable.each, just in case, and put the problem aside. But today, I found a sample code, that clearly demonstrates the difference:
loop1 = []
loop2 = []
calls = ["one", "two", "three"]
calls.each do |c|
loop1 << Proc.new { puts c }
end
for c in calls
loop2 << Proc.new { puts c }
end
loop1[1].call #=> "two"
loop2[1].call #=> "three"
Today I've created a universal rails helper to deal with multiple models of a multi-language project in a common way:
def link_to_add(object, args={})
return '' unless logged_in?
object = [object] unless object.is_a?(Array)
link = link_to(t("#{object.last.to_s}.add"),
new_polymorphic_path(object, args))
content_tag :p, link
end
def link_to_edit(object, args={})
return '' unless logged_in?
object = [object] unless object.is_a?(Array)
return '' if object.last.new_record?
node = object.last.class.to_s.underscore
link = link_to(t("#{node}.edit"),
edit_polymorphic_path(object, args))
content_tag :p, link
end
def link_to_delete(object)
return '' unless logged_in?
object = [object] unless object.is_a?(Array)
return '' if object.last.new_record?
node = object.last.class.to_s.underscore
link = link_to(t("#{node}.delete"), object,
:method => :delete,
:confirm => t("#{node}.confirm_deletion"))
content_tag :p, link
end
Now all links to create, edit or delete an instance look nice and intuitive.
I type short
<%= link_to_add :post %>
instead of long
<% if logged_in? %>
<p><%= link_to t('post.add'), new_post_path %></p>
<% end %>
It handles nested routes. Just type
<%= link_to_edit [@post, @comment] %>
instead of
<% if logged_in? %>
<p><%= link_to t('comment.edit'),
edit_post_comment_path(@post, @comment) %></p>
<% end %>
And my favorite one:
<%= link_to_delete [@post, @comment] %>
instead of
<% if logged_in? %>
<p><%= link_to t('comment.delete'), [@post, @comment],
:method => :delete,
:confirm => t('comment.confirm_deletion') %></p>
<% end unless @comment.new_record? %>
If you, like I today, cannot perform a passwordless login via ssh to a remote linux server after copying a public key to the server with ssh-copy-id command, please check if the key is actually presents among other authorized keys on the server. I found that sometimes it is not.
$ cat .ssh/authorized_keys
The agent has no identities.
To fix the problem just add the -i argument like below:
$ ssh-copy-id -i user@server.tld